Paul v. Charles

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Paul v. Charles

816 So. 2d 837, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7235, 2002 WL 1040273

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 24, 2002

DocketNo. 5D01-2249

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 837 (Paul v. Charles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul v. Charles, 816 So. 2d 837, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7235, 2002 WL 1040273 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that “[i]n appellate proceedings the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.”); Prymus v. Prymus, 753 So.2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that without a transcript or proper substitute of the final hearing below “the presumption of correctness which attaches to this final judgment remains intact and we can find no abuse of discretion in this regard.”).

THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that “[i]n appellate proceedings the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error.”); Prymus v. Prymus, 753 So.2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that without a transcript or proper substitute of the final hearing below “the presumption of correctness which attaches to this final judgment remains intact and we can find no abuse of discretion in this regard.”).

THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 837, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7235, 2002 WL 1040273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-charles-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack