Paul Torres v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 2019
Docket11-18-00330-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Paul Torres v. State (Paul Torres v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Torres v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Opinion filed January 10, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-18-00330-CR ___________

PAUL TORRES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 106th District Court Gaines County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-4100

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paul Torres, has filed an untimely notice of appeal in this cause. Appellant attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion for forensic DNA testing. We dismiss the appeal. The documents on file in this case indicate that the order was signed on September 10, 2018, and that the notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk’s office on November 26, 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed within thirty days after the date that the trial court entered the order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.05 (West 2018). A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on file in this court reflect that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed seventy-seven days after the order was entered. The notice of appeal was, therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Swearingen v. State, 189 S.W.3d 779, 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue. Appellant filed a response but has not shown any grounds upon which this appeal may proceed. We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

January 10, 2019 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swearingen v. State
189 S.W.3d 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Rodarte v. State
860 S.W.2d 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Paul Torres v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-torres-v-state-texapp-2019.