PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2021·No. 20-1873·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1873 Lower Tribunal No. 09-59626 ________________

Paul Steinberg, Appellant,

vs.

Robyn Marlin, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge.

Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellant.

Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Bruce S. Rogow, and Tara A. Campion (Cedar Mountain, NC), for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 81 So. 3d

556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there is no record of the testimony of

witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has

not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its

face must be affirmed.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN (PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Zarate v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
81 So. 3d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)