PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN
This text of PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN (PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1873 Lower Tribunal No. 09-59626 ________________
Paul Steinberg, Appellant,
vs.
Robyn Marlin, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge.
Scott Jay Feder, P.A., and Scott Jay Feder, for appellant.
Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Bruce S. Rogow, and Tara A. Campion (Cedar Mountain, NC), for appellees.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979); Zarate v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 81 So. 3d
556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Where there is no record of the testimony of
witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has
not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure
9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its
face must be affirmed.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PAUL STEINBERG v. ROBYN MARLIN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-steinberg-v-robyn-marlin-fladistctapp-2021.