Paul Stefanyshyn v. Shafer Contracting

190 F. App'x 521

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Paul Stefanyshyn appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Missouri Human Rights Act. Following de novo review, see Meyer v. City of Joplin, 281 F.3d 759, 760 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that Stefanyshyn failed to state a claim under either statute, see 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)-(c) (defining types of prohibited age discrimination); Minn.Stat. § 363A.08(2) (2004) (defining types of prohibited discrimination).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 . The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired.