Paul Stautzenberger v. State
This text of Paul Stautzenberger v. State (Paul Stautzenberger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00125-CR
Paul Stautzenberger, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. C1-CR-05-708869, HONORABLE CARLOS HUMBERTO BARRERA, JUDGE PRESIDING
Paul Stautzenberger filed a notice of appeal from the judgment convicting him of driving with a suspended license and sentencing him to one day in jail and payment of court costs. His brief was originally due April 13, 2009. After receiving notice that his brief was overdue, he requested and received an extension of time to file his brief. On August 28, 2009, this appeal was abated and this cause remanded to determine whether appellant wished to pursue this appeal, was entitled to appointed counsel, or desired appointed counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). At the trial court hearing, appellant stated that he wanted to pursue the appeal and waived appointment of counsel. His brief was then due December 21, 2009. Despite notice that his brief was overdue, Stautzenberger has not filed a brief.
We have reviewed the record presented and find no issue requiring reversal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4). We affirm the judgment of conviction.
G. Alan Waldrop, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Affirmed
Filed: April 1, 2010
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paul Stautzenberger v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-stautzenberger-v-state-texapp-2010.