Paul Smith Construction Co. v. Crowe

Supreme Court of Florida

Paul Smith Construction Co. v. Crowe

200 So. 2d 181, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3944

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 28, 1967

DocketNo. 36356

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 2d 181 (Paul Smith Construction Co. v. Crowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul Smith Construction Co. v. Crowe, 200 So. 2d 181, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3944 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 7, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fes filed by Respondent Billy R. Crowe is granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI