Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr
Opinion
Opinion issued November 20, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00426-CV ——————————— PAUL SANTIAGO MOODY, Appellant V. HOWARD M. REINER, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF VICTORIANO G. SANTIAGO JR., DECEASED, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1106298
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paul Santiago Moody, proceeding pro se, has failed to timely file
his appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1), (d), 38.8(a)(1). On October 31,
2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his deadline to file his appellant’s
brief had expired and that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if he failed to timely file his appellant’s brief or an extension within 10 days of the
date of that notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Appellant failed
to timely file a brief or request an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to
timely file an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Lloyd, and Caughey.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr (Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.