Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr

Opinion

Opinion issued November 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

if he failed to timely file his appellant’s brief or an extension within 10 days of the

date of that notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Appellant failed

to timely file a brief or request an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to

timely file an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Lloyd, and Caughey.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-18-00426-CV ——————————— PAUL SANTIAGO MOODY, Appellant V. HOWARD M. REINER, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF VICTORIANO G. SANTIAGO JR., DECEASED, Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1106298 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paul Santiago Moody, proceeding pro se, has failed to timely file his appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1), (d), 38.8(a)(1). On October 31, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his deadline to file his appellant’s brief had expired and that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution