Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 2018·No. 01-18-00426-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00426-CV ——————————— PAUL SANTIAGO MOODY, Appellant V. HOWARD M. REINER, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF VICTORIANO G. SANTIAGO JR., DECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1106298

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paul Santiago Moody, proceeding pro se, has failed to timely file

his appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1), (d), 38.8(a)(1). On October 31,

2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his deadline to file his appellant’s

brief had expired and that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if he failed to timely file his appellant’s brief or an extension within 10 days of the

date of that notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Appellant failed

to timely file a brief or request an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to

timely file an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Lloyd, and Caughey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr (Paul Santiago Moody v. Howard M. Reiner, Administrator of Estate of Victoriano G. Santiago Jr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.