Paul S. v. Rita S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paul S. v. Rita S.

92 A.D.3d 100, 938 N.Y.2d 481

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2011·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peradotto, J.

Same opinion by Peradotto, J, as in Matter of [103]*103Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).

Fahey and Sconiers, JJ., concur with Peradotto, J.; Smith, J.E, and Lindley, J., dissent in part and vote to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting opinion by Smith, J.E, as in Matter of Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal insofar as it concerns Colleen Y. and Kelly Y. is dismissed and the corrected order is affirmed without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peradotto, J.

Same opinion by Peradotto, J, as in Matter of [103]*103Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).

Fahey and Sconiers, JJ., concur with Peradotto, J.; Smith, J.E, and Lindley, J., dissent in part and vote to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting opinion by Smith, J.E, as in Matter of Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal insofar as it concerns Colleen Y. and Kelly Y. is dismissed and the corrected order is affirmed without costs.

Paul S. v. Rita S., 92 A.D.3d 100, 938 N.Y.2d 481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

92 A.D.3d 100 (Paul S. v. Rita S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related