Paul S. v. Rita S.
This text of 92 A.D.3d 100 (Paul S. v. Rita S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Same opinion by Peradotto, J, as in Matter of [103]*103Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).
Fahey and Sconiers, JJ., concur with Peradotto, J.; Smith, J.E, and Lindley, J., dissent in part and vote to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting opinion by Smith, J.E, as in Matter of Bridget Y. (Kenneth M.Y.) ([appeal No. 1] 92 AD3d 77 [Dec. 30, 2011]).
It is hereby ordered that said appeal insofar as it concerns Colleen Y. and Kelly Y. is dismissed and the corrected order is affirmed without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 100, 938 N.Y.2d 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-s-v-rita-s-nyappdiv-2011.