Paul R. Brumfield v. R.C. Marshall, Superintendent, Socf, Lucasville, Ohio
This text of 780 F.2d 1020 (Paul R. Brumfield v. R.C. Marshall, Superintendent, Socf, Lucasville, Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
(The decision of the Court is referenced in a "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions" appearing in the Federal Reporter.)
PAUL R. BRUMFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R.C. MARSHALL, SUPERINTENDENT, SOCF, LUCASVILLE, OHIO,
Defendant-Appellee.
85-3838
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
11/15/85
APPEAL DISMISSED
S.D.Ohio
ORDER
BEFORE: MERRITT, MARTIN and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.
This matter is before the Court on the petitioner's appeal from the denial of his application for a certificate of probable cause by the district court on September 19, 1985.
Such an order is nonappealable. Rule 22(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
780 F.2d 1020, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 13865, 1985 WL 14009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-r-brumfield-v-rc-marshall-superintendent-socf-ca6-1985.