Paul Parker v. Bnsf Railway Company

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul Parker v. Bnsf Railway Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 F.4th 687
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2024·No. 22-35695·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL W. PARKER, as Personal No. 22-35695 Representative of the Estate of Curtis John Rookaird, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00176-RAJ Western District of Washington, Plaintiff-Appellant, Seattle

v. ORDER

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judge Christen did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Parker v. Bnsf Railway Company, (9th Cir. 2024).

Paul Parker v. Bnsf Railway Company (Paul Parker v. Bnsf Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.