Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 2013·No. 01-13-00127-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 25, 2013

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

NO. 01-13-00127-CV

PAUL OUZENNE AND OUZENNE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellants

V.

LEON SHANKLE AND MARGIE BENTON SHANKLE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 129th Civil District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2003-13270

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Paul Ouzenne and Ouzenne Construction Company, have

neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West

Supp. 2012), § 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012); Order

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle (Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.