Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle
Opinion
Opinion issued June 25, 2013
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
NO. 01-13-00127-CV
PAUL OUZENNE AND OUZENNE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellants
V.
LEON SHANKLE AND MARGIE BENTON SHANKLE, Appellees
On Appeal from the 129th Civil District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2003-13270
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Paul Ouzenne and Ouzenne Construction Company, have
neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West
Supp. 2012), § 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012); Order
Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of
Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle (Paul Ouzeene and Ouzeene Construction Company v. Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.