Paul Miller v. AT&T

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 2019
Docket18-2581
StatusUnpublished

This text of Paul Miller v. AT&T (Paul Miller v. AT&T) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Miller v. AT&T, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-2581 ___________________________

Paul F. Miller

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

AT&T, doing business as Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, also known as AT&T Arkansas; AT&T, doing business as DirecTV LLC

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

JAMS

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

RANDALLS

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________

Submitted: March 19, 2019 Filed: March 27, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Paul Miller appeals the district court’s1 order confirming an arbitration award, and dismissing his application to vacate the award. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in confirming the arbitration award. See Manion v. Nagin, 392 F.3d 294, 298 (8th Cir. 2004) (on appeal from order confirming arbitration award, factual findings are reviewed for clear error and questions of law are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the parties’ appellate motions. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrick T. Manion v. Stephen E. Nagin
392 F.3d 294 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Paul Miller v. AT&T, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-miller-v-att-ca8-2019.