Paul M. Ambrose and Crimora Research and Development Corporation v. John A. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents
This text of 181 F.2d 272 (Paul M. Ambrose and Crimora Research and Development Corporation v. John A. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant Commissioner of Patents in,a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain reissue of a patent with added claims. Quite apart from any question of estoppel, there was no substantial evidence of the “inadvertence, accident, or mistake” required by R.S. § 4916, 35 U.S.C.A. § 64. We express no opinion regarding the District Court’s ruling that the appellant was, as a matter of law, estopped to make the added claims.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 F.2d 272, 86 U.S. App. D.C. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-m-ambrose-and-crimora-research-and-development-corporation-v-john-a-cadc-1950.