Paul Lowery v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina

872 F.2d 418, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3027, 1989 WL 27498
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 1989
Docket88-6633
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 872 F.2d 418 (Paul Lowery v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Lowery v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 872 F.2d 418, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3027, 1989 WL 27498 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

872 F.2d 418
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David W. CHESTER, Attorney General of the State of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees

No. 88-6633.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 1988.
Decided March 13, 1989.

Paul Lowery, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Lowery seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause* to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lowery v. Chester, C/A No. 86-1278-HC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

Lowery also filed a motion for rehearing of the denial of a certificate of probable cause to appeal but our disposition today resolves all issues against Lowery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disher v. Synthes (U.S.A.)
371 F. Supp. 2d 764 (D. South Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
872 F.2d 418, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3027, 1989 WL 27498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-lowery-v-david-w-chester-attorney-general-of--ca4-1989.