Paul Lewis Warren v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 12, 2015
Docket05-14-00356-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Paul Lewis Warren v. State (Paul Lewis Warren v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Lewis Warren v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed January 12, 2015.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00356-CR

PAUL LEWIS WARREN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-81292-2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Evans

Paul Lewis Warren appeals from the revocation of his community supervision for felony

driving while intoxicated . See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp.

2014). The trial court assessed punishment at two years’ imprisonment and a $1,000 fine. On

appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and

without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no

arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App.

[Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436

S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in

Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 140356F.U05

-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

PAUL LEWIS WARREN, Appellant Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court of Collin County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00356-CR V. 380-81292-2013). Opinion delivered by Justice Evans, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Stoddart participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered January 12, 2015.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Paul Lewis Warren v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-lewis-warren-v-state-texapp-2015.