Paul Lee Hibdon v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia

Sixth Circuit

Paul Lee Hibdon v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia

245 F.2d 816, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3288

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 7, 1957

Docket13125_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 F.2d 816 (Paul Lee Hibdon v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul Lee Hibdon v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, 245 F.2d 816, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3288 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court for the Middle District of Tennessee denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. As clearly appears upon the face of the petition filed in the district court, the appellant is confined in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia. Since the appellant is not detained within the territorial jurisdiction of the district court for the Middle District of Tennessee, the court correctly determined that it was without jurisdiction to entertain the petition. Ahrens v. Clark, 1948, 335 U.S. 188, 68 S.Ct. 1443, 92 L.Ed. 1898; United States v. Hayman, 1952, 342 U.S. 205, 213, 72 S.Ct. 263, 96 L.Ed. 232.

The judgment of the district court is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court for the Middle District of Tennessee denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. As clearly appears upon the face of the petition filed in the district court, the appellant is confined in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia. Since the appellant is not detained within the territorial jurisdiction of the district court for the Middle District of Tennessee, the court correctly determined that it was without jurisdiction to entertain the petition. Ahrens v. Clark, 1948, 335 U.S. 188, 68 S.Ct. 1443, 92 L.Ed. 1898; United States v. Hayman, 1952, 342 U.S. 205, 213, 72 S.Ct. 263, 96 L.Ed. 232.

The judgment of the district court is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 F.2d 816, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-lee-hibdon-v-warden-united-states-penitentiary-atlanta-georgia-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack