Paul Lamark Little v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2012
Docket07-12-00043-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Paul Lamark Little v. State (Paul Lamark Little v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Lamark Little v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0042-CR NO. 07-12-0043-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 8, 2012 ______________________________

PAUL LAMARK LITTLE,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees ______________________________

FROM THE 372nd DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY;

NOS. 1215526D and 1215947D; HON. DAVID SCOTT WISCH, PRESIDING _______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant Paul Lamark Little appeals from his convictions for the offenses of evading arrest and aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a firearm. On February 16, 2012, the clerks records were filed. The reporters record was due on February 10, 2012. On February 21, 2012, this Court notified the reporter by letter that the record in each case had not been filed and to advise the Court of the status of the record on or before March 2, 2012. To date, no status report or reporters records have been filed. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 372nd District Court of Tarrant County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine: when the reporters records can reasonably be transcribed into written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of his right to appeal.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issue, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerks record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporters record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental clerks and reporters records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before April 6, 2012. Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before April 6, 2012. It is so ordered. Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Paul Lamark Little v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-lamark-little-v-state-texapp-2012.