Paul L. Lee v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, of Cape Vincent, Philip Coombe, Jr., Commissioner, Cf Philip Coombe, Commissioner of Docs Nys

Second Circuit

Paul L. Lee v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, of Cape Vincent, Philip Coombe, Jr., Commissioner, Cf Philip Coombe, Commissioner of Docs Nys

104 F.3d 349, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37949, 1996 WL 514928

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 11, 1996

Docket96-2236

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 F.3d 349 (Paul L. Lee v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, of Cape Vincent, Philip Coombe, Jr., Commissioner, Cf Philip Coombe, Commissioner of Docs Nys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul L. Lee v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, of Cape Vincent, Philip Coombe, Jr., Commissioner, Cf Philip Coombe, Commissioner of Docs Nys, 104 F.3d 349, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37949, 1996 WL 514928 (2d Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

104 F.3d 349

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
PAUL L. LEE, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Floyd BENNETT, Superintendent, of Cape Vincent, Philip
Coombe, Jr., Commissioner, CF Philip Coombe,
Commissioner of DOCS NYS, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 96-2236.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 11, 1996.

Appearing for Appellants: Joseph M. Latino, Ass't Dist. Att'y, White Plains, N.Y.

Appearing for Appellee: Sally Wasserman, N.Y., N.Y.; Paul L. Lee pro se, New Rochelle, N.Y.

Before MESKILL, KEARSE, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Brieant's Memorandum and Order dated February 26, 1996.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI