Paul L. And Marie C. Drouin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

203 F.2d 953, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 889, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4276
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 17, 1953·No. 10958_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by a taxpayer from a decision of the Tax Court which dismissed his case there for want of jurisdiction. The lack of jurisdiction was found in the taxpayer’s failure to follow the statute with regard to time for proceedings in the Tax Court. The Tax Court’s action was correct. It also appears that the taxpayer was given the notice required by -statute and that he failed to appear at the hearing before the Tax Court. While we endeavor to be particularly careful in cases where a taxpayer represents himself, as this one does, we find nothing in the law to help him nor anything in the circumstances of his case which makes us feel that the law has worked an injustice because of our inability to give him assistance.

The decision will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul L. And Marie C. Drouin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 203 F.2d 953, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 889, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4276 (3d Cir. 1953).

203 F.2d 953 (Paul L. And Marie C. Drouin v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallmark Research Collective
U.S. Tax Court, 2022
Heaberlin v. Commissioner
34 T.C. 58 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)
Albert G. Rich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
250 F.2d 170 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)