Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 02-15-00160-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00160-CV

PAUL KRAMER APPELLANT

V.

MELISSA AND SCOT HOLLMANN APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 352-227900-07

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On September 10, 2015, we notified appellant that his brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court

within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.3(b). We have not received any response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 22, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann (Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.