Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00160-CV
PAUL KRAMER APPELLANT
V.
MELISSA AND SCOT HOLLMANN APPELLEES
------------
FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 352-227900-07
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On September 10, 2015, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court
within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(b). We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 22, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann (Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.