Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann
This text of Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann (Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00160-CV
PAUL KRAMER APPELLANT
V.
MELISSA AND SCOT HOLLMANN APPELLEES
------------
FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 352-227900-07
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On September 10, 2015, we notified appellant that his brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court
within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(b). We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 22, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paul Kramer v. Melissa and Scot Hollmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-kramer-v-melissa-and-scot-hollmann-texapp-2015.