Paul, Keith Bronsha v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2013·No. 05-12-01079-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 10, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01079-CR No. 05-12-01080-CR

KEITH BRONSHA PAUL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-41122-Y, F10-42448-Y

ORDER The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On April 18, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding whether

appellant filed a motion to suppress that encompassed both cases, whether the trial court made

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the motion for both cases, and whether a

hearing was conducted on the basis of a written motion in either case. We ADOPT the trial

court’s findings that: (1) on July 19, 2012, a suppression hearing was conducted on the basis of a

written motion to suppress in both trial court numbers F11-41122 and F10-42448; (2) the written

motion was referenced during the suppression hearing as well as during appellant’s guilty plea

hearing; (3) the written motion to suppress was filed with the district court clerk on April 10, 2013; (4) during the guilty plea hearing in both cases, the trial court explained to appellant that

he could appeal the motion to suppress in both cases; (5) the original findings of fact filed on

July 19, 2012 erroneously omitted trial court number F10-42448; (6) on April 10, 2013, the trial

court issued amended written findings of fact and conclusions of law that include both trial court

numbers; and (7) the trial court made an docket entry on April l9, 2013 stating its original intent

to include both case numbers on the motion to suppress hearing held on July 19, 2012.

Included in the supplemental clerk’s record in each case is appellant’s motion to suppress

and the trial court’s amended findings of fact and conclusions of law. Additionally, on June 9,

2013, we received the reporter’s record of the July 19, 2012 suppression hearing.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to

counsel for each party.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul, Keith Bronsha v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Paul, Keith Bronsha v. State (Paul, Keith Bronsha v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.