Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr.
This text of Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr. (Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 24, 2018
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A18A1414. TAMAROFF v. CUPERTINO, et al.
This is a direct appeal from a final judgment for $3,240.32 in an action for damages. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), appeal from such a judgment for less than $10,000 requires compliance with the discretionary appeal procedures. City of Brunswick v. Todd, 255 Ga. 448, 448 (339 SE2d 589) (1986). For that reason, this direct appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Pathfinder Payment Solutions v. Global Payments Direct, 344 Ga. App. 490, 490-491 (810 SE2d 653) (2018).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/24/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-k-tamaroff-v-ronaldo-p-cupertino-jr-gactapp-2018.