Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 2, 2018·No. A18A1414·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 24, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1414. TAMAROFF v. CUPERTINO, et al.

This is a direct appeal from a final judgment for $3,240.32 in an action for damages. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), appeal from such a judgment for less than $10,000 requires compliance with the discretionary appeal procedures. City of Brunswick v. Todd, 255 Ga. 448, 448 (339 SE2d 589) (1986). For that reason, this direct appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Pathfinder Payment Solutions v. Global Payments Direct, 344 Ga. App. 490, 490-491 (810 SE2d 653) (2018).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/24/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr., (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr. (Paul K. Tamaroff v. Ronaldo P. Cupertino, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Brunswick v. Todd
339 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)
Pathfinder Payment Solutions, Inc. v. Global Payments Direct, Inc.
810 S.E.2d 653 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018)