Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 610
United States Customs Court·Decided June 15, 1956·No. Reap. Dec. 8595; Entry No. 792022·Published

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of fact entered into by and between the respective parties.

On the agreed facts I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of merchandise invoiced as:

74 Hazel Pigskins 1 m.m.
bd
79 Hazel Pigskins 1 m.m.. í>
30 “ “ “ _ W

and that such values were the appraised unit prices, less 46 per centum, plus packing.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, the proper values are the values found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 610 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 610 (Paul K. Frankford, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.