Paul Jones, Jr. v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Cambria County, Paul Jones, Jr. v. Commonwealth Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania

192 F.2d 1018
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1951
Docket10462_1
StatusPublished

This text of 192 F.2d 1018 (Paul Jones, Jr. v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Cambria County, Paul Jones, Jr. v. Commonwealth Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Jones, Jr. v. Protection Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Cambria County, Paul Jones, Jr. v. Commonwealth Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, 192 F.2d 1018 (3d Cir. 1951).

Opinion

192 F.2d 1018

Paul JONES, Jr.
v.
PROTECTION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY, Appellant. Paul JONES, Jr.
v.
COMMONWEALTH MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant.

No. 10459.

No. 10462.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued December 4, 1951.

Decided December 14, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Frederick V. Follmer, Judge.

J. Webster Jones, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant Protection Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

David A. Saltzburg, Philadelphia, Pa. (Kolander & Saltzburg, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant Com. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

J. Peter Williams, Philadelphia, Pa. (Owen B. Rhoads and Barnes, Dechert, Price, Myers & Clark, all of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The questions presented by the instant appeals are really those of fact. The fact findings made by the court below find full support in the evidence. Consideration of the record, the briefs and of the oral argument convinces us that the court below did not commit error. Accordingly the judgments appealed from will be affirmed. 93 F.Supp. 505, in which motion denied 95 F.Supp. 589.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins.
93 F. Supp. 505 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
Jones v. Protection Mut. Fire Ins. of Cambria
95 F. Supp. 589 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 F.2d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-jones-jr-v-protection-mutual-fire-insurance-company-of-cambria-ca3-1951.