Paul Joaquin Ponce v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-22-00024-CR
PAUL JOAQUIN PONCE, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 47th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 65,591-A, Honorable John B. Board, Presiding by Assignment
August 31, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Paul Joaquin Ponce, appeals from the trial court’s judgment
adjudicating guilt and convicting him of the aggravated sexual assault of a child.1 After
initially adjudicating guilt, the trial court ordered the preparation of a presentence
investigation report (PSI) per article 37.07, section 3(d) of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 37.07, § 3(d). Mention was made of the
1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(3)(B). report at the sentencing hearing. The record does not indicate whether it was admitted
into evidence, though. Nor does it indicate if the trial court considered it prior to levying
sentence. Yet, the trial court apparently alluded to it at the hearing. Since then, appellate
counsel attempted to obtain a copy of the document from various sources, including the
community supervision department, trial counsel, and the prosecutor. He met with no
success.
Before us is Appellant’s Motion to Abate Appeal. Through it, he seeks
supplementation of the appellate record with a copy of the PSI. By order dated August
17, 2022, the motion was denied without prejudice, and appellant was given until August
24, 2022, to provide information or authority showing the trial court had considered the
document or intended it to be part of the hearing record susceptible to consideration on
appeal. In response to this Court’s order, appellant filed a subsequent Motion to Abate
Appeal seeking reconsideration of this Court’s denial of the original motion. By Order of
the Court, we grant the motion, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court.
On remand, the trial court is directed to hold a hearing upon notice to the parties and
determine the following matters:
(1) whether a PSI was prepared by the community supervision office; and, if so,
(2) whether it was admitted into evidence for purposes of sentencing.
Should the trial court determine that a PSI was prepared and admitted into
evidence, it shall cause a copy of the PSI to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record
with any necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law. The supplemental clerk’s
record shall be filed on or before September 30, 2022. Appellate briefing deadlines are
suspended until further order of the Court.
2 It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Joaquin Ponce v. the State of Texas (Paul Joaquin Ponce v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.