Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth

462 S.E.2d 120, 21 Va. App. 91
Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided October 10, 1995·No. 0829922·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

By opinion issued September 20, 1994, in Husske v. Commonwealth, 19 Va.App. 30, 448 S.E.2d 331 (1994), a panel of this Court reversed and remanded for retrial Husske’s convictions of forcible sodomy, rape, robbery, and breaking and entering with intent to commit rape. On the Commonwealth’s motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted [92] rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed by an evenly divided court.1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth, 462 S.E.2d 120, 21 Va. App. 91 (Va. Ct. App. 1995).

462 S.E.2d 120 (Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Husske v. Commonwealth
476 S.E.2d 920 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1996)