Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth

462 S.E.2d 120, 21 Va. App. 91

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia

DecidedOctober 10, 1995

Docket0829922

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 462 S.E.2d 120 (Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul J. Husske, s/k/a, etc. v. Commonwealth, 462 S.E.2d 120, 21 Va. App. 91 (Va. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinions

By opinion issued September 20, 1994, in Husske v. Commonwealth, 19 Va.App. 30, 448 S.E.2d 331 (1994), a panel of this Court reversed and remanded for retrial Husske’s convictions of forcible sodomy, rape, robbery, and breaking and entering with intent to commit rape. On the Commonwealth’s motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted [92]*92rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed by an evenly divided court.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By opinion issued September 20, 1994, in Husske v. Commonwealth, 19 Va.App. 30, 448 S.E.2d 331 (1994), a panel of this Court reversed and remanded for retrial Husske’s convictions of forcible sodomy, rape, robbery, and breaking and entering with intent to commit rape. On the Commonwealth’s motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted [92]*92rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed by an evenly divided court.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

462 S.E.2d 120, 21 Va. App. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-j-husske-ska-etc-v-commonwealth-vactapp-1995.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack