Paul J. Carey v. City of Fall River

870 F.2d 40, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3339, 1989 WL 23245
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedMarch 20, 1989
Docket88-1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 870 F.2d 40 (Paul J. Carey v. City of Fall River) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul J. Carey v. City of Fall River, 870 F.2d 40, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3339, 1989 WL 23245 (1st Cir. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the record, briefs, and arguments, we affirm for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion. Carey v. City of Fall River, 708 F.Supp. 431 (D.Mass.1988). We note in particular our agreement with the district court that “It cannot be said that when defendants in this case sought out the criminal complaint against Paul Carey they ‘clearly’ did not have probable cause.” 708 F.Supp. at 435 n. 1. Because there was no clear lack of probable cause, defendants cannot be held liable for violating plaintiff’s substantive due process rights on a malicious prosecution theory. Floyd v. Farrell, 765 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kjellsen v. Mills
517 F.3d 1232 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Sietins v. Joseph
238 F. Supp. 2d 366 (D. Massachusetts, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
870 F.2d 40, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3339, 1989 WL 23245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-j-carey-v-city-of-fall-river-ca1-1989.