Paul H. Parker v. United States

235 F.2d 21, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 262, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3809
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 7, 1956·No. 13059_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction for a robbery committed May 9, 1955. The *22 trial commenced November 21,1955. Insanity was asserted as a defense.

Dr. Epstein of St. Elizabeths Hospital, who had examined and treated the defendant both before and after the crime, .testified regarding his mental condition. The District of Columbia Code, 1951, § 14-308, 29 Stat. 138, forbids physicians to disclose confidential information acquired in attending a patient in a professional capacity. But an amendment, effective August 9, 1955, makes this prohibition inapplicable in criminal trials when the accused raises the defense of insanity. 69 Stat. 612. We think the District Court was right in applying this amendment. Cf. Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574, 587-590, 4 S.Ct. 202, 28 L.Ed. 262. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul H. Parker v. United States, 235 F.2d 21, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 262, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3809 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

235 F.2d 21 (Paul H. Parker v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
117 F.R.D. 292 (District of Columbia, 1987)
State v. Humanik
489 A.2d 691 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
John W. Jackson, Jr. v. United States
337 F.2d 136 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
Herbert S. Carey v. United States
296 F.2d 422 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)