Paul Glen Chambers v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas
This text of 419 F.2d 833 (Paul Glen Chambers v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Chambers was notified that the court was considering summary affirmance, pursuant to Rule 10, and afforded an opportunity to address the merits of the cause in an opposing memorandum. He has not done so. Nonetheless, an inspection of the file and- records in this case satisfies us that the issues presented are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument.
The judgment is affirmed for .the reasons stated in the memorandum and order of the district court, 306 F.Supp. 1102 (D.Kan.1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 F.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-glen-chambers-v-r-i-moseley-warden-united-states-penitentiary-ca10-1969.