Paul Gallizzi General Contractor, Inc. v. Deed Contractors, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Paul Gallizzi General Contractor, Inc. v. Deed Contractors, Inc.

502 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 217, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6262

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 9, 1987

DocketNo. 86-2651

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 28 (Paul Gallizzi General Contractor, Inc. v. Deed Contractors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul Gallizzi General Contractor, Inc. v. Deed Contractors, Inc., 502 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 217, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from in the present case disposes of less than all of the factually interrelated issues in the case, and so is not appealable. Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974). McClain Construction Corp. v. Roberts, 351 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Petitioner urges that, in the event we accept respondents’ argument regarding appealability, we convert the notice of appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari. Because petitioner alleges that one effect of the order is to deprive it of any security during the remainder of the proceedings below, such that petitioner might not have an adequate remedy by appeal from a final judgment, we grant that request. However, we find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the order under review, and we deny the petition for writ of certio-rari.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from in the present case disposes of less than all of the factually interrelated issues in the case, and so is not appealable. Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974). McClain Construction Corp. v. Roberts, 351 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Accordingly, respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Petitioner urges that, in the event we accept respondents’ argument regarding appealability, we convert the notice of appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari. Because petitioner alleges that one effect of the order is to deprive it of any security during the remainder of the proceedings below, such that petitioner might not have an adequate remedy by appeal from a final judgment, we grant that request. However, we find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the order under review, and we deny the petition for writ of certio-rari.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 So. 2d 28, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 217, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-gallizzi-general-contractor-inc-v-deed-contractors-inc-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack