Paul G. House v. Ricky Bell, Warden
This text of 283 F.3d 755 (Paul G. House v. Ricky Bell, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paul G. HOUSE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-6136.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Filed: April 19, 2002.
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 35(c), a majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted to grant the request of a member of this Court for rehearing of this case en banc,
"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the parties file simultaneous supplemental briefs not later than Monday, May 6, 2002. Reargument will be scheduled for Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 2:00 P.M. EST.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 F.3d 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-g-house-v-ricky-bell-warden-ca6-2002.