Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson and Joe Missildine
This text of Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson and Joe Missildine (Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson and Joe Missildine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-02-025-CV
PAUL EARL DORSEY,
Appellant
v.
GARY L. JOHNSON
AND JOE MISSILDINE,
Appellees
From the 52nd District Court
Coryell County, Texas
Trial Court # COT-99-32530
CONCURRING OPINION
Until the precedential value of the majority opinion in Jacobo v. Binur is established, I will continue to note my disagreement with this court’s manner of reviewing no-evidence summary judgment motions which reference summary judgment evidence. I respectfully note my disagreement with the portion of the opinion discussing the application of the traditional standard of review for summary judgments to this no-evidence motion for summary judgment. See Jacobo v. Binur, 70 S.W.3d 330, 339-344 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet. h.)(Gray, J. dissenting). The error, however, does not prevent a proper result in this case. Accordingly, I concur in the judgment.
TOM GRAY
Justice
Concurring opinion delivered and filed October 9, 2002
Do not publish
gn: justify"> TOM GRAY
Before Chief Justice Davis,
Justice Vance, and
Justice Gray
Affirmed
Opinion delivered and filed July 18, 2001
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paul Earl Dorsey v. Gary L. Johnson and Joe Missildine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-earl-dorsey-v-gary-l-johnson-and-joe-missildi-texapp-2002.