Paul Douglas Hatcher, Jr. v. Charles Winslow

38 F.3d 1213, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36642, 1994 WL 559203

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 13, 1994
• Docket: 94-6807
• Status: Published

Opinion

38 F.3d 1213
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Paul Douglas HATCHER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Charles WINSLOW, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6807.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted August 25, 1994.
Decided October 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-93-615)

Paul Douglas Hatcher, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED