Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 16, 2024·No. 01-24-00008-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued April 16, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.

28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for

preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that

this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

We therefore dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for

want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment (Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.