Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment
Opinion
Opinion issued April 16, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.
28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for
preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
We therefore dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for
want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions
as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment (Paul Douglas Celestine v. Hexa Property Managment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.