Paul Close v. Mark Lund

Eighth Circuit

Paul Close v. Mark Lund

281 F. App'x 639

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 2008

Docket07-2075

StatusUnpublished

This text of 281 F. App'x 639 (Paul Close v. Mark Lund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul Close v. Mark Lund, 281 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Paul Close appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Turner v. Honeywell Fed. Mfg. & Techs., LLC, 336 F.3d 716, 719-20 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo *640 review standard), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Paul Close appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Turner v. Honeywell Fed. Mfg. & Techs., LLC, 336 F.3d 716, 719-20 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo *640 review standard), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 F. App'x 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-close-v-mark-lund-ca8-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack