Paul Close v. Mark Lund

Eighth Circuit

Paul Close v. Mark Lund

281 F. App'x 639

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 16, 2008·No. 07-2075·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Paul Close appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Turner v. Honeywell Fed. Mfg. & Techs., LLC, 336 F.3d 716, 719-20 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo *640 review standard), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Paul Close appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Turner v. Honeywell Fed. Mfg. & Techs., LLC, 336 F.3d 716, 719-20 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo *640 review standard), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Paul Close v. Mark Lund, 281 F. App'x 639 (8th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

281 F. App'x 639 (Paul Close v. Mark Lund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related