Paul Bros. v. Long Branch & Lakeside Special Road & Bridge District

92 So. 687, 83 Fla. 706
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 92 So. 687 (Paul Bros. v. Long Branch & Lakeside Special Road & Bridge District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Bros. v. Long Branch & Lakeside Special Road & Bridge District, 92 So. 687, 83 Fla. 706 (Fla. 1922).

Opinions

Per Curiam.-

This suit was brought under the statute to validate $1,000,000.00 of 6% bonds designed to be issued for the construction of roads in a district under Chapter 8888, Acts of 1921, which purports to create and establish the Long Branch and Lakeside Special Road and Bridge District in Clay County, Florida. The validity of the statute is challenged. An appeal was taken from a decree rendered by the Circuit Judge validating the bonds.

It appears by the Act that the district comprises about 150,000 acres of land which it is shown was in 1920 assessed at $353,920.00. The provisions of the Act are too voluminous to be set out here.

Even if Chapter 8888 does not contain distinct and unrelated provisions upon more than one subject and. matter properly connected therewith in violation of Section 16, Article III, of the Constitution, and does not violate Sections 20 and 21, Article III of the Constitution in the provisions regulating the practice of courts of justice, if not also in other provisions, it is obvious that the essential provisions of the Act are so arbitrary and oppressive' as tax burdens upon property of small value considered with reference to the multiplied enormous special assessment authorized to be made against it, as that the statute is a palpable abuse of the police and taxation powers of the State that will inevitably deprive the land owners of their property in violation of the State and Federal Constitutions. This makes the entire Act invalid and unenforceable.

Reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. City of Tampa
3 So. 2d 484 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Cosby v. Jumper Creek Drainage District
3 So. 2d 356 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Taylor v. Williams
195 So. 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Williams v. Keyes
186 So. 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
City of Hialeah v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'n
174 So. 843 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Martha Bright Farms, Inc. v. Broward County Port Authority
158 So. 70 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park
149 So. 409 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Stuart
120 So. 335 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Jackson Lumber Co. v. Walton County
116 So. 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co.
116 So. 449 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Lakeland
115 So. 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of Sarasota
109 So. 473 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Getzen v. Sumter County
103 So. 104 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Consolidated Land Co. v. Tyler
101 So. 280 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 687, 83 Fla. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-bros-v-long-branch-lakeside-special-road-bridge-district-fla-1922.