Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.

521 N.E.2d 438, 70 N.Y.2d 990, 526 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 137
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 N.Y.2d 739
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 1988·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur dismissed for untimeliness (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). [See, 70 NY2d 739.]

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S., 521 N.E.2d 438, 70 N.Y.2d 990, 526 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 137 (N.Y. 1988).

521 N.E.2d 438 (Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.
514 N.E.2d 382 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)