Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.

521 N.E.2d 438, 70 N.Y.2d 990, 526 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 137
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 9, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 521 N.E.2d 438 (Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S., 521 N.E.2d 438, 70 N.Y.2d 990, 526 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 137 (N.Y. 1988).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur dismissed for untimeliness (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). [See, 70 NY2d 739.]

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul B. S. v. Pamela J. S.
514 N.E.2d 382 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 N.E.2d 438, 70 N.Y.2d 990, 526 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-b-s-v-pamela-j-s-ny-1988.