Paul Anthony May v. Sharon May

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 9, 2022
Docket13-22-00089-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Paul Anthony May v. Sharon May (Paul Anthony May v. Sharon May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Anthony May v. Sharon May, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00089-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

PAUL ANTHONY MAY, Appellant,

v.

SHARON MAY, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

The cause is before the Court on its own motion. On April 4, 2022, the Clerk of

this Court notified appellant that the clerk’s record in the above cause was originally due

on April 1, 2022, and that the deputy district clerk, Esther Ruiz, had notified this Court that

appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record. The Clerk of this

Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if

it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

On March 22, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that he was delinquent

in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal

was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from the date of

receipt of this letter. See id. R. 42.3(b),(c).

Appellant has failed to comply with a court order and a notice from the clerk

requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 9th day of June, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Paul Anthony May v. Sharon May, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-anthony-may-v-sharon-may-texapp-2022.