Paul Anthony Gibson v. Edward W. Murray

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23397, 1995 WL 370689
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 1995·No. 95-6028·Published

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Paul Anthony GIBSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-6028.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 20, 1995.

Paul Anthony Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Gibson v. Murray, No. CA-94-232 (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Anthony Gibson v. Edward W. Murray, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23397, 1995 WL 370689 (4th Cir. 1995).

59 F.3d 166 (Paul Anthony Gibson v. Edward W. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.