Paul Anthony Ashford, Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of Paul Anthony Ashford, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Paul Anthony Ashford, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOS. 12-24-00143-CR 12-24-00144-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
PAUL ANTHONY ASHFORD, JR., § APPEAL FROM THE 87TH APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM
Paul Anthony Ashford, Jr. pleaded “guilty” to indecency with a child by sexual contact and aggravated sexual assault of a child as a lesser included offense of sex abuse of a child, continuous victim under fourteen. In accordance with the agreed punishment recommendation, the trial court sentenced Appellant to twenty years in prison for the indecency offense and thirty years in prison for aggravated sexual assault. Appellant appealed. The clerk’s record has been filed and the trial court’s certifications state that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. The certifications are signed by Appellant and his counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The clerk’s record does not otherwise indicate that the trial court gave Appellant permission to appeal. When the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal. Id. This Court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. Based on our review of the record, the trial court’s certifications appear to accurately state that these are plea bargain cases and Appellant has no right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). Because the trial court did not grant Appellant the right to appeal, we dismiss the appeals.
Opinion delivered June 12, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
2 COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
JUNE 12, 2024
NO. 12-24-00143-CR
PAUL ANTHONY ASHFORD, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Appeal from the 87th District Court of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 87CR-22-35663)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J COURT OF APPEALS
NO. 12-24-00144-CR
PAUL ANTHONY ASHFORD, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Appeal from the 87th District Court of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 87CR-22-35692)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paul Anthony Ashford, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-anthony-ashford-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.