Paul Albert Patterson v. United States
Opinion
After petitioner, Paul Albert Patterson, served his time and paid his fine for his 1963 federal conviction based on an indictment charging him with depositing in the mails a letter containing obscene, lewd, lascivious and indecent photographs, he applied for a writ in-the. nature of coram nobis to the District Court. The District Judge denied relief.
We have found the recent Supreme Court cases do not mandate a different result. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 93 S.Ct. 2628, 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U.S. 139, 93 S.Ct. 2674, 37 L.Ed.2d 513 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U.S. 115, 93 S.Ct. 2680, 37 L.Ed.2d 492 (1973); United States v. 12 200 Ft. Reels of Super 8mm Film, 413 U.S. 123, 93 S.Ct. 2665, 37 L.Ed.2d 500 (1973).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
487 F.2d 1300 (Paul Albert Patterson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.