Paul Albert Patterson v. United States

487 F.2d 1300, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10610
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 11, 1974·No. 73-2089·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After petitioner, Paul Albert Patterson, served his time and paid his fine for his 1963 federal conviction based on an indictment charging him with depositing in the mails a letter containing obscene, lewd, lascivious and indecent photographs, he applied for a writ in-the. nature of coram nobis to the District Court. The District Judge denied relief.

We have found the recent Supreme Court cases do not mandate a different result. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).; Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 93 S.Ct. 2628, 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U.S. 139, 93 S.Ct. 2674, 37 L.Ed.2d 513 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U.S. 115, 93 S.Ct. 2680, 37 L.Ed.2d 492 (1973); United States v. 12 200 Ft. Reels of Super 8mm Film, 413 U.S. 123, 93 S.Ct. 2665, 37 L.Ed.2d 500 (1973).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul Albert Patterson v. United States, 487 F.2d 1300, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10610 (5th Cir. 1974).

487 F.2d 1300 (Paul Albert Patterson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. California
413 U.S. 15 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
413 U.S. 49 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Kaplan v. California
413 U.S. 115 (Supreme Court, 1973)
United States v. Orito
413 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Kaplan v. California
413 U.S. 115 (Supreme Court, 1973)
United States v. Orito
413 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 1973)