Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James

Fifth Circuit

Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James

276 F.2d 919, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4760

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1960

Docket18148_1

StatusPublished

This text of 276 F.2d 919 (Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James, 276 F.2d 919, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4760 (5th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the judgment of the Trial Court presents only questions of fact and one claim of erroneous admission of testimony by a hand-writing expert. The legal ruling on the admissibility of the testimony was clearly without error. The fact issues were all resolved by detailed findings of fact by the Trial Court. The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Trial Court.

The subsidiary motions are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the judgment of the Trial Court presents only questions of fact and one claim of erroneous admission of testimony by a hand-writing expert. The legal ruling on the admissibility of the testimony was clearly without error. The fact issues were all resolved by detailed findings of fact by the Trial Court. The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Trial Court.

The subsidiary motions are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 F.2d 919, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-a-lambert-v-a-c-james-ca5-1960.