Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James
276 F.2d 919, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4760
Opinion
This appeal from the judgment of the Trial Court presents only questions of fact and one claim of erroneous admission of testimony by a hand-writing expert. The legal ruling on the admissibility of the testimony was clearly without error. The fact issues were all resolved by detailed findings of fact by the Trial Court. The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Trial Court.
The subsidiary motions are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James, 276 F.2d 919, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4760 (5th Cir. 1960).
276 F.2d 919 (Paul A. Lambert v. A. C. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.