Patzowsky v. Mutual Shoemakers, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Patzowsky v. Mutual Shoemakers, Inc.

89 A. 61, 111 Me. 585, 1913 Me. LEXIS 142

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 13, 1913·Published

Opinion

This is an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiffs are assignees of a firm, doing business in Boston, Mass., under the name' of The Newcastle Leather Company, and the defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of shoes at Norridgewock, Me. Plea was the general issue.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the case was reported to the Law Court for its determination upon so much of the evidence as is legally admissible. Judgment for plaintiff for $1426.47, with Interest from the date of the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiffs are assignees of a firm, doing business in Boston, Mass., under the name' of The Newcastle Leather Company, and the defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of shoes at Norridgewock, Me. Plea was the general issue.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the case was reported to the Law Court for its determination upon so much of the evidence as is legally admissible. Judgment for plaintiff for $1426.47, with Interest from the date of the writ.

Patzowsky v. Mutual Shoemakers, Inc., 89 A. 61, 111 Me. 585, 1913 Me. LEXIS 142 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

89 A. 61 (Patzowsky v. Mutual Shoemakers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.