Patty v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Patty v. State

372 S.W.3d 913, 2012 WL 3176303, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 966

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 7, 2012·No. No. WD 74131·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Sabin Patty pled guilty in February 2008 to the felonies of first-degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo, and second-degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo. He filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Su[914] preme Court Rule 24.035, contending that his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to fully investigate an alibi defense. The circuit court denied Patty’s motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Sabin Patty pled guilty in February 2008 to the felonies of first-degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo, and second-degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo. He filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Su[914] preme Court Rule 24.035, contending that his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to fully investigate an alibi defense. The circuit court denied Patty’s motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Patty v. State, 372 S.W.3d 913, 2012 WL 3176303, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 966 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

372 S.W.3d 913 (Patty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.