Patty Jean Talbott and Sam Talbott v. Judy F. Slaven

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedAugust 17, 2004
Docket03A01-9609-CV-00304
StatusPublished

This text of Patty Jean Talbott and Sam Talbott v. Judy F. Slaven (Patty Jean Talbott and Sam Talbott v. Judy F. Slaven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patty Jean Talbott and Sam Talbott v. Judy F. Slaven, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTI ON

PATTY J EAN TALBOTT ) KNOX COUNTY a n d SAM TALBOTT ) 03A01- 9609- CV- 00304 ) Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s ) ) ) HON. W HEELER ROSENBALM, v. ) J UDGE ) ) J UDY F. SLAVEN ) ) De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED

J OHN M FOLEY OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLANTS .

PAUL F. DUNN OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLEE

O P I N I O N

Godda r d, P. J .

Pa t t y J e a n Ta l bot t a nd he r hus ba nd, Sa m Ta l bot t , a pp e a l

a j u d g me nt e nt e r e d i n t he Ci r c ui t Cour t f or Knox Count y whi c h, i n

a c c o r d a nc e wi t h a j ur y ve r di c t , a wa r de d he r $2264. 59 f or pe r s o n a l

i n j u r i e s r e c e i ve d i n a n a ut omobi l e a c c i de nt . The j ur y obvi ous l y

f o u n d t ha t M . Ta l bot t s uf f e r e d no da ma ge s a nd f i xe d hi s r e c ov e r y r

a t z e r o. The Ta l bot t s a ppe a l , i ns i s t i ng t ha t t he j udgme nt s a r e

s o i n a d e qua t e t ha t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d i n not gr a nt i ng a ne w

t r i a l or a n a ddi t ur . The y a l s o i ns i s t t he Tr i a l Cour t e r r e d i n

n o t a wa r di ng di s c r e t i ona r y c os t s whi c h t ot a l e d $1595. 40.

The s t a nda r d of r e vi e w i n de t e r mi ni ng whe t he r a n

a p p e l l a t e c our t s houl d r e qui r e a ne w t r i a l be c a us e of t he

i n a d e q u a c y of a j ur y ve r di c t i s whe t he r t he a mount a wa r de d f a l l s

b e l o w t he r a nge of r e a s ona bl e ne s s . Smi t h v. She l t on, 569 S. W 2 d .

4 2 1 ( Te nn. 1978) . Al t hough not s pe c i f i c a l l y c i t i ng Smi t h, t h i s

Co u r t , i n W l ke r s on v . Al t i z e r , 845 S. W 2d 744, 749 i .

( Te n n . App. 1992) , f ol l owe d t he s a me r ul e a nd, i n doi ng s o, s a i d

t h e f o l l owi ng:

Thi s Cour t doe s not ha ve t he a ut hor i t y t o gr a nt a n a d di t ur . Te nn. Code Ann. § 20- 10- 101. W r e vi e w t he e a c t i on of t he t r i a l c our t i n s ugge s t i ng a n a ddi t ur p u r s ua nt t o Te nne s s e e Rul e of Appe l l a t e Pr oc e dur e 1 3 ( d) . Te nn. Code Ann. 20- 10- 101( b) ( 2) .

Howe ve r , t he s t a t ut e doe s not pr ovi de a ny gui da nc e wh e n t he t r i a l c our t r e f us e s t o gr a nt a n a ddi t ur . Se e Fo s t e r v. Amc on I nt e r na t i ona l , I nc . , 621 S. W 2d 142, . 1 4 6 ( Te nn. 1981) .

He r e , t he j ur y' s ve r di c t wa s not wi t hi n t he " r a nge o f r e a s ona bl e ne s s . " The r e f or e , t he t r i a l c our t s houl d h a ve s ugge s t e d a n a dd i t ur or gr a nt e d a ne w t r i a l . Fo s t e r v. Amc on I nt e r na t i ona l , I nc . , 621 S. W 2d 142 . ( Te nn. 1981) . W a r e of t he opi ni on t ha t t he t r i a l e c o ur t a bus e d i t s di s c r e t i on i n f a i l i ng t o s ugge s t a n a d di t ur o r , i n t he a l t e r na t i ve , f a i l i ng t o gr a nt a ne w t r i al .

W r e c ogni z e t ha t t he r e i s e vi de nc e i n t he r e c or d f r om whi c h t h e e

j u r y c o ul d ma ke a s i gni f i c a nt l y l a r ge r a wa r d a s t o M s . Ta l bot t r

a n d a l s o a n a wa r d a s t o M . Ta l bot t . r

2 The Ta l bot t ' s pr oof s howe d t ha t t he me di c a l e xpe ns e s

i n c u r r e d by M s . Ta l bot t i nc i de nt t o he r i nj ur i e s we r e $4719. 5 9 , r

a n d t h a t s he s uf f e r e d i nj u r i e s t o t he l e f t s i de of he r f a c e , h e r

n e c k, h e r l e f t a r m a nd h e r c he s t , t ha t s he wa s t a ke n by a mbul a nc e

t o St . M r y' s Hos pi t a l Eme r ge nc y Room whe r e s he wa s e xa mi ne d a n d a

x - r a ye d. She wa s a l s o t r e a t e d wi t h a ne c k c ol l a r a nd gi ve n a

p r e s c r i pt i on me di c i ne be f o r e be i ng r e l e a s e d.

I mme di a t e l y a f t e r t he a c c i de nt , s he wa s t r e a t e d br i e f l y

b y h e r phys i c i a n f a t he r a n d t he r e a f t e r by a c hi r opr a c t or f or a

s h o r t p e r i od o f t i me . La t e r , s he c a me unde r t he c a r e of Dr .

Ge o r g e Fi l l mor e who pr e s c r i be d phys i c a l t he r a py. W n t he he

p h y s i c a l t he r a py di d not s i gni f i c a nt l y i mpr ove he r c ondi t i on, Dr .

Fi l l mo r e r e f e r r e d h e r t o Dr . A. B. Kl i e f ot h, I I I , a ne ur os ur ge o n .

MRI s c a ns we r e done unde r Dr . Kl i e f ot h' s s upe r vi s i on, whi c h

r e v e a l e d a s ma l l r upt ur e d di s c i n he r ne c k. Thi s c a us e d he r n o

p r o b l e m a nd s ur ge r y wa s not i ndi c a t e d. Dr . Kl i e f ot h t e s t i f i e d

t h a t i n hi s opi ni on t he a ut omobi l e a c c i de nt a ggr a va t e d a pr e -

e x i s t i n g c ondi t i on on he r l e f t s i de , a nd wa s of t he f ur t he r

o p i n i o n t ha t s he mor e l i ke l y t ha n not woul d ne e d f ut ur e me di c a l

t r e a t me nt a nd me di c a t i on f or pa i n.

I f t he f or e goi ng we r e t he onl y e vi de nc e t ouc hi ng upo n

M s . Ta l bot t ' s i nj ur i e s we woul d ha ve no he s i t a nc y i n f i ndi ng t h e r

a wa r d wa s not wi t hi n t he r a nge of r e a s ona bl e ne s s . Howe ve r , t h e r e

i s o t h e r pr oof i n t he r e c or d whi c h s hows t ha t M s . Ta l bot t ha d r

b e e n i n vol ve d i n a pr e vi ous a ut omobi l e a c c i de nt i n 1977, a nd s o me

3 n i n e mo n t hs pr i or t o t he a c c i de nt f or whi c h s he s e e ks r e c ove r y

s h e v i s i t e d Dr . Robe r t Fi ne l l i , c ompl a i ni ng of t he s a me i nj ur i e s

a n d p r o bl e ms s he c ont e nds we r e a r e s ul t of t he a c c i de nt .

The r e wa s a l s o i nt r oduc e d a me di c a l hi s t or y

q u e s t i o nna i r e whi c h M s . Ta l bot t c ompl e t e d a ppr oxi ma t e l y t hr e e r

mo n t h s pr i or t o t he a c c i de nt whe r e s he a l s o c ompl a i ne d of t he

s a me t y pe pa i n a nd di s a bi l i t i e s . I n t hi s c onne c t i on, M s . r

Ta l bo t t t e s t i f i e d a s f ol l ows :

Q Di d you t e l l me i n M . Fol e y' s of f i c e i n hi s r p r e s e nc e t ha t a f t e r Dr . Fi ne l l i di d t hos e di a gnos t i c s t udi e s t he n you got t ot a l l y we l l a s f a r a s you know a n yhow?

A Af t e r t he mye l ogr a m wa s done I di d not ha ve a n ymor e pr obl e ms e xc e pt one t ha t I s a w a de nt i s t a bout .

Q Di d t he a ns we r - - di d you gi ve me t he a ns we r a t t h a t t i me t ha t I di d not ha ve a nymor e ne c k pr obl e ms a f t e r t ha t or a r m or s houl de r pr obl e m a f t e r I ha d t ha t d o ne ?

A Af t e r I ha d t he mye l ogr a m; t ha t ' s t r ue . I t hought I wa s c ompl e t e l y we l l .

Q W n I a s ke d you a bout t ha t , di d you t e l l me a bout he h a vi ng s ome mor e ne c k pa i n be f or e t hi s a c c i de nt ?

A I don' t r e me mbe r ; I j us t don' t r e me mbe r .

. . . .

Q You he a r d your f a t he r I be l i e ve - - be f or e I ge t i nt o t ha t - - t e s t i f y t oda y t ha t s o f a r a s he r e c a l l e d b e f or e t hi s a ut omobi l e a c c i de nt of Apr i l t he 15t h of 1 9 94, t ha t you ha d no t ha d a ny di z z i ne s s e xc e pt pe r ha ps wh e n you we r e e xpe c t i ng your c hi l dr e n?

A I h e a r d h i m t e s t i f y t o t ha t ?

Q Ye s .

A Ye s , I di d he a r hi m s a y t ha t .

4 Q And i s di z z i ne s s one of t he t hi ngs t ha t you now c o mpl a i n of ?

A Ye s .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.
621 S.W.2d 142 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1981)
Wilkerson Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. Altizer
845 S.W.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Patty Jean Talbott and Sam Talbott v. Judy F. Slaven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patty-jean-talbott-and-sam-talbott-v-judy-f-slaven-tennctapp-2004.