Patton's Appeal

31 Pa. 465
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 Pa. 465 (Patton's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patton's Appeal, 31 Pa. 465 (Pa. 1858).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lowrie, C. J.

This ease does not require much discussion, for it can be made plain in a very few words. Robert Blair’s will was duly proved, and letters testamentary were issued upon it. To this an appeal to the Register’s Court was taken; a feigned issue was ordered and tried in the Common Pleas, and found against the will and certified hack to the Register’s Court; and thereupon the letters testamentary were vacated and letters of administration granted. But the decision of the feigned issue, and of course all that depended on it, was subject to a writ of error and to the judgment thereon. A writ of error was taken, and the judgment below was reversed and judgment entered in favour of the original probate.

The consequence is, that the letters of administration must be treated as raising a conditional administration in the nature of one pendente lite, and that now they ought to be revoked, and letters testamentary granted on the will. A petition was presented by the executor named in the will to have this done; and at a Register’s Court appointed and called for the purpose, the petition was heard and refused. This is equivalent to a decree dismissing the petition for want of title in the petitioner; and it is subject to correction here on appeal, and it must be corrected. We do not hereby affect anything done under the letters of administration. So far as the estate has been properly administered by the administratrix, it must stand as administered, and she must account according to law. The executor will have power only over .so much of the estate as remains unadministered.

The decree of the Register’s Court rejecting the petition to revoke the letters of administration granted to Martha Blair, is reversed; and it is now here ordered and decreed that the said letters of administration be revoked as of this date, and that letters testamentary be issued by the register of wills to Joseph Patton as executor of the will of Robert Blair, deceased; and it is further ordered and decreed, that the said Martha Blair pay the costs of this proceeding, to be taxed and collected in the manner appointed by law for costs before registers and registers’ courts, and the record is now remanded to the Register’s Court that the cause may be proceeded in according to this decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gorsuch Estate
8 Pa. D. & C.2d 190 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1956)
Lewis v. Burrow
127 S.W.2d 795 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1939)
Eichelberger's Estate
10 Pa. D. & C. 789 (York County Orphans' Court, 1927)
Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank
162 N.W. 454 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1917)
Schluter v. . Bowery Savings Bank
22 N.E. 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Pa. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pattons-appeal-pa-1858.