Patton v. Yount

464 U.S. 980, 104 S. Ct. 420, 78 L. Ed. 2d 356, 52 U.S.L.W. 3386, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 2346
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patton v. Yount. Read the opinion of the Court — 467 U.S. 1025
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 14, 1983·No. No. 83-95·Published

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certio-rari granted, ante, p. 913.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that George E. Schu-macher, Esquire, of Pittsburgh, Pa., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patton v. Yount, 464 U.S. 980, 104 S. Ct. 420, 78 L. Ed. 2d 356, 52 U.S.L.W. 3386, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 2346 (1983).

464 U.S. 980 (Patton v. Yount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.