Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.

65 A.3d 913

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 625 Pa. 1 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 26, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court majority’s precedential Opinion has sub silentio nullified the statutory employer doctrine and effectively overruled this Court’s decision in McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co., 302 Pa. 287, 153 A. 424 (1930), by grafting a fact question onto the McDonald analysis that can never be answered in a way that allows the statutory employer doctrine to apply?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court majority’s precedential Opinion has sub silentio nullified the statutory employer doctrine and effectively overruled this Court’s decision in McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co., 302 Pa. 287, 153 A. 424 (1930), by grafting a fact question onto the McDonald analysis that can never be answered in a way that allows the statutory employer doctrine to apply?

Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc., 65 A.3d 913 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

65 A.3d 913 (Patton v. Worthington Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related