Patton v. Worthington Associate, Inc.
65 A.3d 913, 620 Pa. 49, 2013 WL 1788008, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 804
This text of 65 A.3d 913 (Patton v. Worthington Associate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Patton v. Worthington Associate, Inc., 65 A.3d 913, 620 Pa. 49, 2013 WL 1788008, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 804 (Pa. 2013).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court majority’s precedential Opinion has sub silentio nullified the statutory employer doctrine and effectively overruled this Court’s decision in McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co., 302 Pa. 287, 153 A. 424 (1930), by grafting a fact question onto the McDonald analysis that can never be answered in a way that allows the statutory employer doctrine to apply?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.
153 A. 424 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
65 A.3d 913, 620 Pa. 49, 2013 WL 1788008, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patton-v-worthington-associate-inc-pa-2013.