Patton v. Wagner

19 Ark. 233
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a bill for partition of lands. It seems to have been regularly filed and order of publication was taken against all the defendants as non-residents. No exception seems to have been taken as to the statutory notice. But the Court seems to have proceeded in dismissing the bill upon the ground, that our various statutory provisions as to partition have taken away the original jurisdiction of chancery on this head.

In this the Court below was in error. The statute but cumulates the remedy; and if, nevertheless, a party should elect to seek his remedy in chancery, as these parties seem to have done, he is entitled to such as the Chancellor can afford him.

The order of the Court dismissing the bill, will, therefore, be reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to the Court below to proceed with the case according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patton v. Wagner, 19 Ark. 233 (Ark. 1857).

19 Ark. 233 (Patton v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. Gibson
572 S.W.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1978)
Overton v. Porterfield
177 S.W.2d 735 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1944)
City Realty Co. v. S. R. H. Robinson Contracting Co.
183 F. 176 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas, 1910)
Dunbar v. Bourland
114 S.W. 467 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
Lester v. Kirtley
104 S.W. 213 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)
Moore v. Willey
91 S.W. 184 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)
Rankin v. Schofield
98 S.W. 674 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)
Branton v. Branton
23 Ark. 569 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1861)